I'm curious about the difference in pain and a comparison of effectiveness between Rejuran Healer and HB.

I am looking into Rejuran procedures, but I am hesitant because there are many reviews saying that Healer is very painful. I heard that HB is nearly painless, so I am wondering if there is actually that much of a difference.

If the two products are similar in terms of effectiveness, I don't think there is any reason to specifically choose the painful healer, and I would also like to know if there are any differences in effectiveness other than pain.

If anyone has experienced both, it would be a great help if you could honestly share the differences in pain, post-procedure satisfaction, and duration of the results.

0
0
Comments 4
  • This comment has been deleted.
  • 뛰어난하마S1776260923329
    오 리쥬란 HB가 덜 아프다는 말은 들었는데 진짜 차이가 큰가요? 효과도 비슷하다면 담번엔 HB로 갈아타고 싶네요ㅠㅠ 시술 후기 공유해주셔서 감사함당!
  • 갱이
    효과는 아무래도 오리지날이 더 낫지 싶어요 hb는 마취성분이 들어간 만큼 pn이 적게 들어갔다고 해요
  • 뜨거운체리I1772001846546
    저도 궁금해요 리쥬란 관심많은데
  • 근면한나팔꽃Z1759044539387
    Author
    리쥬란 힐러와 HB 비교 궁금해하시는 분들 많아요. 실제 경험담이 있으면 큰 도움이 될 것 같아요.