I'm worried about dead skin cells. Who would Vitaran be recommended for?

Lately, I have such severe facial exfoliation that my makeup looks patchy, and my skin feels very tight after washing it. Even with diligent moisturizing, the dead skin cells reappear quickly, so I am considering getting a procedure at a clinic, but I cannot decide whether to get Vitaran or Pico Toning first.

I’ve heard that Pico Toning is popular for improving melasma and blemishes, but since my current concerns are dead skin cells and rough skin texture rather than pigmentation, I’m wondering which procedure would be a better fit for me. On the other hand, I am becoming increasingly interested in Vitaran after seeing many reviews stating that it helps with skin regeneration, hydration, and improving the skin barrier.

I’ve heard conflicting opinions; some say it’s better to get Vitaran first if the dead skin cells are caused by dryness, while others suggest that proceeding with Pico Toning after restoring the skin's condition leads to higher satisfaction. So, for someone like me with severe dead skin cells, I keep wondering if Vitaran is the more suitable choice.

Has anyone else tried Vitaran or Pico Toning after struggling with facial exfoliation like me? I would love to hear your experiences regarding the actual changes you saw and which treatment you were most satisfied with.

I would appreciate honest reviews and advice from those who have received both procedures on which one is more recommended for skin with severe dead skin cells.